<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Under the hood: bigger, stronger, better!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entropiagateway.com/2009/12/under-the-hood-bigger-stronger-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entropiagateway.com/2009/12/under-the-hood-bigger-stronger-better/</link>
	<description>Participant and developer blogs about Entropia Universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:35:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikyoban</title>
		<link>http://www.entropiagateway.com/2009/12/under-the-hood-bigger-stronger-better/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>mikyoban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entropiagateway.com/?p=555#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I am sad :(
I was so happy when you posted this news Marco, I was so happy when 10.6 comes with tier as it is expected to be a smart system (and it is in its fundamental, only the upgrade process is not) and a potential way to balancing well between unL &amp; L items
Even with a costly upgrade process it could be ok. 
But the way MA implemented that is not costly, it is &#039;over the sky&#039; costly, hard to do and so risky (i will never gamble a car on just &#039;one&#039; click)
So this is not a rebalancing, this is just kill the vast majority of unL items. You posted on EF that we have the choice and you are rigth but this is not plain honest, because as L items could be easily upgraded they will become more attractive than unL
Sorry to be so negative in this post but I cant be postive today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sad <img src='http://www.entropiagateway.com/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I was so happy when you posted this news Marco, I was so happy when 10.6 comes with tier as it is expected to be a smart system (and it is in its fundamental, only the upgrade process is not) and a potential way to balancing well between unL &amp; L items<br />
Even with a costly upgrade process it could be ok.<br />
But the way MA implemented that is not costly, it is &#8216;over the sky&#8217; costly, hard to do and so risky (i will never gamble a car on just &#8216;one&#8217; click)<br />
So this is not a rebalancing, this is just kill the vast majority of unL items. You posted on EF that we have the choice and you are rigth but this is not plain honest, because as L items could be easily upgraded they will become more attractive than unL<br />
Sorry to be so negative in this post but I cant be postive today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanBuren</title>
		<link>http://www.entropiagateway.com/2009/12/under-the-hood-bigger-stronger-better/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>VanBuren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entropiagateway.com/?p=555#comment-214</guid>
		<description>WOW! That sounds really impresive. I&#039;m looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! That sounds really impresive. I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
